Skip to content

Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.

Sign up free →

ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING

Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.

Sign up free

Free · one email · already registered? Log in

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

Carbon credits · sustainability reporting

Carbon credits in sustainability reporting: what must, and must never, appear

Carbon credits in sustainability reporting follow one rule before any other: they are never netted off the emissions a company reports.

Where they do appear is a separate disclosure — UK SRS S2 paragraph 36(e) in the UK, and ESRS E1 for companies reporting under the CSRD.

What a company may then say about its credits in marketing is a third question, answered by consumer law.

Checked against 22 sources fromDepartment for Business and TradeFinancial Conduct AuthorityGHG Protocollegislation.gov.ukEFRAGCouncil of the EUand 7 moreSee the sources

The gross-accounting rule

Offsets never reduce reported emissions

A carbon credit report and an emissions inventory are not the same document.

UK SRS S2 paragraph 29(a) requires a company’s “absolute gross greenhouse gas emissions generated during the reporting period”, and the word gross is the control.

The SECR regulations of 2018 contain no netting-off provision, so there is no legal basis for a post-offset SECR figure.

The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard says it “should not be used to quantify the reductions associated with GHG mitigation projects for use as offsets or credits”, which is the job of its separate project protocol.

The Protocol’s standards FAQ deals with inventory questions and does not address offsets at all.

A report that nets credits into its Scope 1, 2 or 3 figures has misstated them, whatever it calls the result.

The same separation runs through the wider sustainability reporting standards, which treat every metric the same way.

Our summary of each instrument's own wording, as at 30 September 2026.
RegimeWhat it says about credits
SECR (SI 2018/1155)An emissions and energy disclosure with no netting-off provision.
UK SRS S2¶29(a): absolute gross emissions; ¶36(c): a net target travels with its gross target; ¶36(e): planned credit use.
ESRS E1 (revised)Gross targets; credits excluded from the GHG emissions calculation; credits cancelled and purchased disclosed separately.
GHG ProtocolThe Corporate Standard is not used to quantify offsets; project accounting is a separate protocol.

UK SRS S2 ¶36(e)

Where credits do appear: the separate disclosure

UK SRS S2 paragraph 36(e) applies where a company has a net greenhouse gas emissions target and plans to use carbon credits to achieve it.

It asks for four items: how far the target relies on credits, which third-party scheme will verify or certify them, the type of credit, and any other factors needed to understand their credibility and integrity.

The standard’s own example of item (iv) is “assumptions regarding the permanence of the carbon offset”.

Paragraph B71 confirms that “an entity is required to disclose only its planned use of carbon credits”, so credits already bought are optional context.

Paragraph 36(c) sits in front of it: a company that discloses a net target is “also required to separately disclose its associated gross greenhouse gas emissions target”.

The trigger is the net target, so a company with no net target owes nothing under paragraph 36(e), however many credits it buys.

The UK text is IFRS S2’s, unchanged: the government stated in its consultation response that “it is the government’s preference that amendments should be issued by the ISSB, rather than making UK specific changes”.

UK SRS S2 ¶36(e) · disclosure skeleton

36(e)(i)How far does achieving your net target rely on carbon credits?
36(e)(ii)Which third-party scheme will verify or certify the credits?
36(e)(iii)What type of credit — and is it a reduction or a removal?
36(e)(iv)Which credibility and integrity factor matters most to a reader?

Answer each item and the skeleton appears here.

Source: UK SRS S2 ¶36(c), ¶36(e), ¶B71 (DBT, February 2026). Bands in item (i) are your input, not thresholds in the standard.

The four items

Paragraph 36(e), as the standard words it

Source: UK SRS S2 ¶36(e), Department for Business and Trade, February 2026. The practical reading is ours.
ItemWhat must be disclosedPractical reading
36(e)(i)The extent to which, and how, achieving any net target relies on the use of carbon creditsA quantified share, not a sentence saying credits "may" be used.
36(e)(ii)Which third-party scheme(s) will verify or certify the carbon creditsName the programme: Verified Carbon Standard, Gold Standard, Woodland Carbon Code and so on. A withdrawn scheme does not answer it.
36(e)(iii)The type of credit: nature-based or technological carbon removal, and reduction or removalTwo separate axes, both required, often conflated.
36(e)(iv)Any other factors necessary to understand the credibility and integrity of the creditsPermanence is the standard's own example; additionality and methodology approval are the obvious companions.

The Department for Business and Trade published UK SRS S1 and S2 on 25 February 2026 for voluntary use.

On 30 September 2026 the FCA published Policy Statement PS26/19, whose final rules require in-scope listed companies to report against UK SRS on a comply or explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

Its consultation, CP26/5, had proposed making UK SRS S2 mandatory; the final rules apply comply or explain across all categories of disclosure, with a one-year relief for Scope 3 and two years for UK SRS S1.

So a listed company with a net target and planned credit use will either make the paragraph 36(e) disclosure or explain why not, in reports published from 2028.

The integrity factors behind item (iv) are taken test by test in carbon credit risk analysis.

CSRD and ESRS E1

What the CSRD asks about carbon credits

For a company reporting under the CSRD, the gross rule is written into ESRS E1 in terms.

The revised ESRS E1 says emission reduction targets “shall be gross targets”, and excludes purchased, sold or transferred carbon credits from the calculation of GHG emissions.

Credits appear instead as their own disclosure: the tonnes verified against recognised quality standards and cancelled in the period, the tonnes bought and not yet cancelled, and the share from removal projects.

The revised standards were adopted by the Commission on 3 July 2026 and, under Article 3 of Delegated Regulation C(2026) 5010, apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

EFRAG’s own draft amended ESRS E1 of November 2025 was its advice to the Commission, and the adopted text is what binds.

From financial year 2027 the CSRD reaches undertakings above €450 million net turnover and 1,000 employees, under Articles 19a and 29a of the Accounting Directive as amended.

Which carbon credit providers suit CSRD reporting?

ESRS approves no provider, registry or scheme.

What it asks for is a tonnage of credits verified against “recognised quality standards” and cancelled, so a credit needs a named standard and a cancellation record behind it.

Which standards count as recognised is for the undertaking to explain, and the rating agencies are one input to that explanation, not a substitute for it.

Revised ESRS E1, in its own words

  1. Targets
    Gross targets only

    "The undertaking shall not include GHG removals, carbon credits or avoided emissions as means of achieving the GHG emission reduction targets."

  2. Inventory
    Credits stay out of the totals

    Do "not include any removals, any purchased, sold or transferred carbon credits or any GHG allowances in the calculation of GHG emissions."

  3. Disclosure
    Credits reported separately

    Credits verified against recognised quality standards and cancelled in the period; credits purchased and not yet cancelled; the share from removal projects.

Source: EFRAG Knowledge Hub, simplified ESRS E1 delegated-act text. Paragraph numbers have moved between drafts; the wording is quoted instead.

Offset claims

The rules that govern offset claims

Disclosing credits correctly in a report is one question; what a company then says about them in marketing — “carbon neutral”, “net zero”, “offset” — is another.

In the UK that second question is governed by general consumer law, and no instrument targets carbon credits or offsetting claims specifically.

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 prohibits unfair commercial practices, misleading actions and misleading omissions for conduct on or after 6 April 2025.

Its Schedule 20 blacklist of practices banned outright contains nothing about carbon, climate or offsetting, so an offset-based claim is unlawful only if it misleads.

Under section 182(6) the CMA can impose a penalty of up to £300,000 or, if higher, 10% of the respondent’s turnover.

The CMA’s Green Claims Code asks that a claim be truthful and accurate, clear and unambiguous, not omit or hide important information, make fair comparisons, consider the full life cycle and be substantiated.

The Code still cites the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, which continue only for acts before 6 April 2025, and the CMA says its guidance continues to apply in substance.

The Code and its companion guidance are collected on GOV.UK and on the Green Claims Code campaign site, for the exact wording rather than a paraphrase.

The CMA’s supply-chain guidance of 22 January 2026 makes clear that a business cannot rely blindly on a supplier’s assurances about a claim.

The ASA applies CAP Code section 11, whose rule 11.1 reads “The basis of environmental claims must be clear”, and its settled position is that an unqualified “carbon neutral” claim is misleading.

In the EU, Directive (EU) 2024/825 applies from 27 September 2026 and bans claims, based on offsetting, that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive greenhouse gas impact.

The separate EU Green Claims Directive is stalled awaiting the Council’s first-reading position; it has not been withdrawn.

Which certification, if any, can sit behind a carbon neutral claim is its own question, because PAS 2060 and the original Climate Neutral Certified badge are no longer current — see carbon neutral certification.

Three tiers, often collapsed into one

TierInstrumentStatus
LawDMCC Act 2024, Part 4In force since 6 April 2025
GuidanceCMA Green Claims Code; supply-chain guidanceThe CMA's view of the law
Self-regulationCAP Code section 11Applied by the ASA

Source: legislation.gov.uk; CMA; ASA.

The integrity screens

What sits behind “credibility and integrity”

Supply side · ICVCM

The Core Carbon Principles

Ten Core Carbon Principles in three groups: governance, emissions impact and sustainable development. A programme becomes CCP-Eligible and a methodology, version by version, CCP-Approved; the assessment status table listed 44 CCP-Approved methodologies as at 12 August 2026.

Demand side · VCMI

The Claims Code

VCMI Claims Code v3.1 sets Silver, Gold and Platinum claims against remaining emissions, after four foundational criteria. It says credits “are not counted as internal emission reductions”, so no tier is a carbon neutral claim.

UK government · DESNZ

Six integrity principles

The principles of 15 November 2024 are guidance, not law, and one of the six is to measure and disclose planned use of credits as part of sustainability reporting. The consultation that followed published a summary of responses on 26 March 2026; the formal response had not been published as at 30 September 2026.

None of these screens is written into UK SRS S2, which asks only for the factors a reader needs and leaves the substance to the company.

The four tests that do most of the work inside them — additionality, baseline and over-crediting, permanence and leakage — are covered in carbon credit risk analysis, and the agencies that score them in carbon credit ratings.

Whether buying or trading a credit is itself a regulated activity is a separate question, answered in carbon credit regulation in the UK.

To talk a disclosure through before it is filed, you can book a free 15-minute call.

Frequently asked

Questions people ask

Can carbon credits be deducted from reported emissions?

No. UK SRS S2 paragraph 29(a) requires absolute gross greenhouse gas emissions, SECR contains no netting-off provision, and the revised ESRS E1 says an undertaking shall not include purchased, sold or transferred carbon credits in the calculation of its GHG emissions. Credits are disclosed separately from the inventory, never subtracted from it.

Which carbon credit providers are suitable for CSRD reporting?

CSRD and ESRS approve no provider, registry or scheme. The revised ESRS E1 asks for the amount of carbon credits, in tonnes of CO2e, that are verified against recognised quality standards and cancelled in the reporting period, the amount purchased and not yet cancelled, and the share from removal projects. So a credit used in a CSRD report needs to be traceable to a named quality standard and a cancellation record; which standard counts as recognised is for the undertaking to explain.

What regulatory requirements govern corporate carbon offset claims in sustainability reporting?

In a UK SRS S2 report, paragraph 36(e) sets what must be said about planned credit use against a net target. What a company then says in marketing is governed by general consumer law: the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 prohibits misleading actions and omissions from 6 April 2025, with CMA penalties of up to £300,000 or 10% of turnover, whichever is higher. The CMA Green Claims Code and CAP Code section 11 set out how the regulators read that law. In the EU, Directive (EU) 2024/825 bans product-level neutrality claims based on offsetting from 27 September 2026.

What does UK SRS S2 require about carbon credits?

Where a company has a net greenhouse gas emissions target and plans to use carbon credits to achieve it, paragraph 36(e) requires four items: how far the target relies on credits, which third-party scheme will verify or certify them, the type of credit, and any other factors needed to understand their credibility and integrity. Paragraph B71 says only planned use must be disclosed.

Is UK SRS S2 mandatory?

Not as a hard requirement. UK SRS S1 and S2 were published by the Department for Business and Trade on 25 February 2026 for voluntary use. On 30 September 2026 the FCA published Policy Statement PS26/19, whose final rules require in-scope listed companies to report against UK SRS on a comply or explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with first reporting in 2028. CP26/5 had proposed making UK SRS S2 mandatory; the final rules apply comply or explain across all categories of disclosure.

Do carbon credits already bought have to be disclosed under UK SRS S2?

No. Paragraph B71 states that an entity is required to disclose only its planned use of carbon credits. Information about credits already bought may be included where it helps a reader understand the target, but it is not required.

Does a company with no net target have to disclose its carbon credits?

Not under paragraph 36(e), which is triggered by a net greenhouse gas emissions target. A company with no net target can buy and retire credits without a 36(e) disclosure. Any marketing claim it makes about them is still subject to consumer law and the advertising codes.

Does a CCP label mean a carbon credit is high quality?

Not on its own. The ICVCM approves carbon crediting programmes as CCP-Eligible and methodologies, version by version, as CCP-Approved. The label says a credit was issued under an approved methodology by an eligible programme; it is not an assessment of how an individual project has performed.

Are offset-based carbon neutral claims banned in the UK?

No. No UK instrument bans them outright, and the DMCC Act blacklist in Schedule 20 names nothing about carbon, climate or offsetting. They are actionable if they mislead, and the ASA position is that an unqualified carbon neutral claim is misleading, so the basis of the claim, including any offsetting, has to be clear.

Sources

Primary sources

Every figure, date and status on this page traces to the instrument’s owner. Secondary commentary is never the source for a number.

  1. Department for Business and Trade
    UK SRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures — ¶29(a), ¶36(c), ¶36(e), ¶B70–B71

    Gross emissions, the gross-beside-net rule and the four carbon credit items.

  2. Department for Business and Trade
    Exposure drafts of UK SRS: consultation response, §1.45

    The government's preference that amendments come from the ISSB.

  3. Financial Conduct Authority
    PS26/19: Aligning listed issuers' sustainability disclosures with international standards (30 September 2026)

    Final rules: report against UK SRS on a comply or explain basis, periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 (¶1.2, ¶1.7).

  4. GHG Protocol
    Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition)

    Not to be used to quantify reductions for use as offsets or credits.

  5. legislation.gov.uk
    Companies (Directors' Report) and LLP (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018

    SECR: an emissions disclosure with no netting-off provision.

  6. EFRAG
    Simplified ESRS E1 — delegated act text (Knowledge Hub)

    Gross targets; carbon credits cancelled and purchased; credits excluded from GHG emissions.

  7. Council of the EU
    Commission Delegated Regulation C(2026) 5010 final, Article 3

    The revised ESRS apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

  8. EUR-Lex
    Directive 2013/34/EU (consolidated 18 March 2026), Articles 19a and 29a

    CSRD scope: net turnover above €450m and more than 1,000 employees.

  9. EFRAG
    Draft amended ESRS E1 Climate Change (November 2025)

    EFRAG's technical advice to the Commission; superseded by the adopted delegated act.

  10. legislation.gov.uk
    Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, Part 4

    ss.225–227: unfair practices, misleading actions and omissions, from 6 April 2025.

  11. legislation.gov.uk
    DMCC Act 2024, section 182(6)

    CMA penalty cap: £300,000 or, if higher, 10% of turnover.

  12. legislation.gov.uk
    DMCC Act 2024, section 252

    The CPRs 2008 continue only for acts before 6 April 2025.

  13. CMA
    Green Claims Code (CMA146)

    The six principles; published 20 September 2021.

  14. CMA
    Making green claims: getting it right, across the supply chain (22 January 2026)

    Supplier assurances do not substitute for verification.

  15. ASA
    CAP Code, section 11 — Environmental claims

    Rule 11.1: the basis of environmental claims must be clear.

  16. EUR-Lex
    Directive (EU) 2024/825, Annex I point 4c and Article 4(1)

    The EU offsetting-claim ban, applying from 27 September 2026.

  17. European Parliament
    Legislative Observatory, procedure 2023/0085(COD) — Green Claims Directive

    Awaiting Council first-reading position; not withdrawn.

  18. ICVCM
    The Core Carbon Principles

    Ten principles in three groups.

  19. ICVCM
    Assessment status

    44 CCP-Approved methodologies as at 12 August 2026.

  20. VCMI
    Claims Code of Practice v3.1 (15 August 2025)

    Silver, Gold and Platinum; credits not counted as internal reductions. VCMI now also lists a v3.2 dated September 2026.

  21. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    Principles for voluntary carbon and nature market integrity (15 November 2024)

    Six non-binding principles, including disclosing planned use.

  22. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
    Voluntary carbon and nature markets: raising integrity — consultation

    Summary of responses 26 March 2026; formal response not yet published.

Book a free consultation