Carbon credit intelligence
Buying and selling a voluntary carbon credit sits outside the UK’s investment-regulation perimeter — but a derivative built on top of one usually does not.
The distinction is easy to blur, and getting it wrong tells a reader structuring a forward or a price swap the opposite of what the law implies for that structure.
An article-by-article read of Part III of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (arts 74–89) finds no category naming a voluntary carbon credit held or traded outright. A spot credit is not a security under article 76, not a debt instrument under article 77, and not an emission allowance under article 82A (which covers only auctioned allowances and two-day spot trading) or article 82B (limited, by the Order’s own definitions, to allowances created under article 18 of the UK ETS Order, SI 2020/1265).
Article 89 — the catch-all for “rights to or interests in investments” — cannot rescue the case for regulation either. It is parasitic: it reaches only what “is specified by any other provision of this Part,” so it cannot independently pull in a credit that nothing else in the Order names.
The FCA’s consumer guidance states plainly that “carbon credits are not currently regulated by the FCA.” That is consistent with the reading above, but the page cites no provision of the Order and draws no distinction between a spot credit and a derivative built on one, or between a voluntary credit and a UK ETS allowance — useful corroboration, not the rule itself.
A future or a contract for difference written over a carbon credit is a different question, and the two must not be blurred into one. Article 84 defines a future’s underlying as “a commodity or property of any other description”; article 85 defines a CFD’s underlying as “the value or price of property of any description.” Both are broad enough to reach a carbon credit.
A future is excluded from regulation only where it is made “for commercial and not investment purposes” (article 84(2)–(7)) — a test that turns on contract structure and trading mechanics, not on what the buyer intends to do with the credit afterwards. A CFD is excluded only where actual delivery of the credit is intended (article 85(2)(a)). Options over a credit (article 83) are narrower again, caught only through the Schedule 2 venue-trading or clearing gate that applies to MiFID-style instruments.
UK ETS allowances are specified investments under article 82B — but only when provided by a specified type of firm, under article 82B(2). The FCA Handbook (PERG 2.6.19D) confirms the same scope. Neither provision, nor PERG, mentions voluntary credits at all: reasoning from “the UK ETS is regulated” to any conclusion about the voluntary market borrows an authority the statute does not give it — the two sit on entirely separate hooks.
The sentence that must never stand alone.
Written flat and unqualified — “voluntary carbon credits are not specified investments” — the true statement above becomes a false one, because it silently drops the derivatives limb. A reader structuring a forward or a price swap over a credit would be told the opposite of what the Order implies for that structure.
The safe version keeps both halves in the same breath: a spot credit is not a specified investment; a future or CFD written over one may be.
HM Treasury’s Voluntary carbon and nature markets: raising integrity consultation ran from 17 April to 10 July 2025 and drew around 200 responses. A summary of responses was published on 26 March 2026, described in the document itself as issued “in advance of the formal government response, due over the summer.” As at 24 August 2026, no formal government response has been published, so the legal treatment of a voluntary carbon credit remains an open policy question rather than settled law.
None of this touches how a credit may be described once it has been bought. That is governed by general consumer law rather than by the investment perimeter above: the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 has prohibited unfair commercial practices and misleading actions across the board since 6 April 2025, and its Schedule 20 blacklist — the 32 practices banned outright, regardless of effect — names nothing specific to carbon, climate or offsetting. No offset-based claim is banned outright in the UK; it is actionable only if it is misleading. How that plays out against a company’s mandatory UK SRS disclosures is set out in carbon credits in sustainability reporting.
The FCA’s own regulatory footprint in this space runs wider than carbon credit trading itself — its statutory authority and consultation timeline for UK SRS reporting are covered in the FCA’s UK SRS framework on uksrs.org.uk.
SRS Credit provides independent carbon credit risk analysis to sit alongside the legal and disclosure questions above.
Talk to us